When I feel very strongly about something, I've realized there is no better way to let off steam than the Internet. I just post what I'm bothered with online and bask in the responses. Not all responses are pleasant, most people do not agree with what I say, but this is free therapy. This is we, exercising the freedom of speech by starting a debate, a discussion, creating a meme, sharing an emotion. Which is why the freedom of the Internet matters. You cannot and should not filter human thoughts and what is the Internet if not a vast connection of human brains?
Traditional news distribution channels are on the decline. With the iconic Washington Post being sold off to Jeff Bozos (founder Amazon.com) and news paper/magazine subscriptions at an all time low, things are looking bleak for the the news paper industry. With new mediums of information consumption emerging (tablets, smart phones, smart watch etc), the news industry has shifted to the model of "paid online content". Unfortunately, a typical internet surfer does not expect to pay for any content! After all, we have grown accustomed to consuming information for free. To encourage users to pay up, some websites, like the NY times, allow you to view 10 free articles a month, after which you're expected to use your credit card and subscribe. They're clearly banking on their reputation as a premium news provider, hoping users will pay for their quality articles.
Simply put, this "paid content" model is a direct translation of the good old news paper subscription model. Others, like Forbes, are relying on advertisements and insist on showing you a full blown ad before you browse any content. Its annoying to say the least. The modern web user has grown accustomed to the presence of ads, however, the relevancy of the ad matters as much as the article its wrapped around. When I'm reading a political opinion piece for ,example an ad about "How to Speed up your PC" is not exactly relevant or welcome. A blind reliability on external ad providers may not be good enough. I am not saying that NY Times, Forbes, the Guardian are not going to last, their journalistic value is immense and cannot be debated upon. What they need is a better way of making money out of their content.
Strong social media integration and micro-payments may be the answer. Simply monetize the "like" button. Let visitors to your site register for free, and all content is open. If a users clicks on the "like" button next to an article he may be asked to contribute some money, a really small amount of sum (as low as 10 cents) that people will not bat an eyelid before saying yes. Micro-payment providers will play a big role in the model, although convincing online contributors to start monetizing through micro-payments is proving to be tricky. An excellent article on PaidContent highlights both the promise and the challenges of this model. Maybe the answer is BitCoins? (Peer to Peer online currency, no central authority or bank). If we can get rid of credit cards and just deal in online currency, the process of making the actual payment could be simple and seamlessly integrated into your online experience.
I'm a product manager, specializing in data science driven products & initiatives. When I'm not working, you'll find me riding my bike, reading a book, hiking and enjoying live music.